People preys on the weak because it fears the strong.

I think the strong is good, the weak is bad. It might be a too extreme opinion, so I will add my comment.

​I say that people harass others not because they are 'evil' but it is their innate 'instinct' to harass or exploit weak people.

​The reason for that I assume is from the fact that bullying specific weak classmates in childhood is very common in global and any kids don't have serious guilty for their deed. Even though bullying directly weak classmates are only a few (who're bold and brave), any others (who don't want to be involved in) also don't like to hang out with victims, even just mock them or enjoy the show behind. It's not much different even in our adult society.

​So humanity was born like that I assume. Also, I don't want to say that's evil. It's just their natural instinct like animals. All humans have this instinct to harass or exploit the weak inside but they get education morality which suppresses this desire as they're grown, or they don't do that because of others or society's eyes. (I say even people who are considered 'good' can harass weak people. But this is not the directive but subtle way. I've seen many 'good' people act like that in my life. Hypocrisy itself.)

​Now let me have one extreme example.

​Some woman was raped by gangs. Of course, she will blame gangs. But I want to ask her. "Did you try to protect yourself by recognizing that you were born as a woman who is weak physically? Learning Jiu-jitsu is fine, having lethal spray is fine. Both are better. Did you try even a little?"

​If she didn't proceed to protect her even for a little bit, I don't think gangs who raped her has 100% responsibility. If a woman is strong and smart in the will, she will prepare to protect herself as knowing this world is very harsh and dangerous. There are already too many successful cases that a woman could save herself by using special weapons (spray) against sexual assault or rape.

​Everybody knows that sexual crime is very prevalent and common today.

​So if a woman didn't prepare anything to protect herself, I think she also helped to finish this kind of crime. Thus, I don't pity her at all.

Someone may get the point.

​I don't say that I worship the strong itself, but people must become strong for preventing this kind of harassment from others.

​Someone will object. "If you say that, you can be also bad for someone who is stronger than you."

​Then I will answer. "I agree that I have some possibility to cause harassment or crime from someone who is stronger than me because I am weaker than them. But if I am a little weaker than them, will they really try to harass me? What if they also can get hurt a little by me? Then they will skip me, and seek other stupid, easy target comparatively than me. And as a result, the weakest or stupidest target becomes bad to bring crime or harassment. (Don't get me wrong, here strength doesn't mean only simple wealth or power but also somewhat wisdom and smartness.)

​When all people can protect themselves with enough power, there will be no trouble or crime, and peace can come. Even though this peace is not real, I don't think there is no true peace in the world at all. "If you want peace, prepare for war." That's what I want to say as "Peace by equality of each power." I know, of course, it will never happen in reality. It's just my theory.

​*** Therefore, I can't say that some victims who can't do anything to protect themselves because of a specific environment which makes it impossible is samely bad. ***

​The important fact is not that the strength itself is good, but trying to become stronger for protecting self and preventing harassment or crime from others is. Maybe somewhat intention or will to be stronger.

That's why I want to avoid or contempt weak or stupid people who blame only others but not themselves. NEVER. They never consider that their weakness might bring this all problems. Don't you think this mind is childish and selfish a little bit?

​I'm sick of those people srsly.

Popular posts from this blog

 I think today prevalent depression of the world is not from the accident but on a certain purpose by some people. ​High-class society leads global people into despair upon instigating them on obsession in feminism, misogyny, LGBT for conflict with others. Media coaxes such people. "Fight for your right and freedom! Go on!" ​But it's just a mind trap for firing conflicts among people. ​I'm fine but I feel today many people seem to be really sick inside. That's why I want to be alone srsly af. ​Normal people don't want to meet sick people. It's normal right? Then sick people will get lonely, lead themselves to despair, and finally kill someone or themselves. ​So what is the true certain purpose on that? ​Controlling the global population upon decreasing birth rates by spreading feminism, misogyny, LGBT, and increasing suicidal rates and a lot of crimes by making the world chaotic, desperate. ​If peace is upon society. No one would fight. If the conflict is ...
Read more

Why it is impossible to judge someone is good or evil.

At first, I want to set one premise that two concepts "intention" and "outcome" could be someone's moral standards to judge he is good or evil. (What else? If you can find other factors, let me know.) And I will focus on verifying whether these two can be really moral standards or not. Let's begin. The first, "intention". Can we say someone is good when he tried to do that for a good purpose but the outcome is bad? If your answer is yes. You must say that the woman who has good intentions to help a guy but doesn't realize she annoys him by helping him because she is not enough to be clever to know it is still a good person. Really? (If you still say yes, it's all over and intention is destined to be the only way to judge someone's moral standard. However, I don't think she is a good person. Because she will keep annoying him due to her ignorance. So I keep on my process of thinking.) If the answer is no. "Intention" itself...
Read more