Underdogma

 The fact that the weak have been suffered from the strong doesn't guarantee that it is justice that the weak takes revenge on the strong. That revenge by the weak is somewhat savage, grown deeply from desire and hatred toward the strong, not justice for the right. Today, a lot of people try to take advantage of the name of the weak. They think that any violence they cause can be justified in the name of the weak. They're bold and shameless under protection as the name of the weak. Humans are the same. The difference is that just someone is strong, someone is weak. That's the difference. They both just try to take advantage of as much as they can in their every position. The real motivation that leads people is mere desire and covetousness, not justice. 

Popular posts from this blog

 I think today prevalent depression of the world is not from the accident but on a certain purpose by some people. ​High-class society leads global people into despair upon instigating them on obsession in feminism, misogyny, LGBT for conflict with others. Media coaxes such people. "Fight for your right and freedom! Go on!" ​But it's just a mind trap for firing conflicts among people. ​I'm fine but I feel today many people seem to be really sick inside. That's why I want to be alone srsly af. ​Normal people don't want to meet sick people. It's normal right? Then sick people will get lonely, lead themselves to despair, and finally kill someone or themselves. ​So what is the true certain purpose on that? ​Controlling the global population upon decreasing birth rates by spreading feminism, misogyny, LGBT, and increasing suicidal rates and a lot of crimes by making the world chaotic, desperate. ​If peace is upon society. No one would fight. If the conflict is ...
Read more

Why it is impossible to judge someone is good or evil.

At first, I want to set one premise that two concepts "intention" and "outcome" could be someone's moral standards to judge he is good or evil. (What else? If you can find other factors, let me know.) And I will focus on verifying whether these two can be really moral standards or not. Let's begin. The first, "intention". Can we say someone is good when he tried to do that for a good purpose but the outcome is bad? If your answer is yes. You must say that the woman who has good intentions to help a guy but doesn't realize she annoys him by helping him because she is not enough to be clever to know it is still a good person. Really? (If you still say yes, it's all over and intention is destined to be the only way to judge someone's moral standard. However, I don't think she is a good person. Because she will keep annoying him due to her ignorance. So I keep on my process of thinking.) If the answer is no. "Intention" itself...
Read more